linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] sched/irq: add irq utilization tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDG3d5HtmTXmz4SB9J9Ncv-ATPXsh_VsyJAB9516GLQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:21:14 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
        viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
        Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] sched/irq: add irq utilization tracking

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 05:32, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> wrote:

> > > >
> > > >  #if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) || defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING)
> > > >         if ((irq_delta + steal) && sched_feat(NONTASK_CAPACITY))
> > > > -               sched_rt_avg_update(rq, irq_delta + steal);
> > > > +               update_irq_load_avg(rq, irq_delta + steal);
> > >
> > > I think we should not add steal time into irq load tracking, steal
> > > time is always 0 on native kernel which doesn't matter, what will
> > > happen when guest disables IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING and enables
> > > PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING? Steal time is not the real irq util_avg. In
> > > addition, we haven't exposed power management for performance which
> > > means that e.g. schedutil governor can not cooperate with passive mode
> > > intel_pstate driver to tune the OPP. To decay the old steal time avg
> > > and add the new one just wastes cpu cycles.
> >
> > In fact, I have kept the same behavior as with rt_avg, which was
> > already adding steal time when computing scale_rt_capacity, which is
> > used to reflect the remaining capacity for FAIR tasks and is used in
> > load balance. I'm not sure that it's worth using different variables
> > for irq and steal.
> > That being said, I see a possible optimization in schedutil when
> > PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enable and IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is disable.
> > With this kind of config, scale_irq_capacity can be a nop for
> > schedutil but scales the utilization for scale_rt_capacity
>
> Yeah, this is what in my mind before, you can make a patch for that. :)

ok, I'm going to prepare a patch

Thanks

>
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li