linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 00/12] sched/fair: Migrate 'misfit' tasks on asymmetric capacity systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0205e147-00cc-bc8b-104a-9cb4392ac0f8@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:14:59 +0200
From:   Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, gaku.inami.xh@...esas.com,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 00/12] sched/fair: Migrate 'misfit' tasks on asymmetric
 capacity systems

On 07/31/2018 02:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 16:30, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/26/2018 07:14 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:

[...]

>> The task layout of the test looks like n=85 always running tasks (each
>> for ~ 1.25ms on big or little) and they all get created and run one
> 
> How mistfit task can make a difference for a benchmark which uses 1.25ms tasks ?

Ah, sorry! This was a typo. It should be ~ 1.25s.