linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 00/12] sched/fair: Migrate 'misfit' tasks on asymmetric capacity systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180731125042.GC29978@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:50:42 +0100
From:   Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        gaku.inami.xh@...esas.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 00/12] sched/fair: Migrate 'misfit' tasks on asymmetric
 capacity systems

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 01:10:49PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On 31/07/18 13:00, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Aside from the first patch, which I posted the change on, I've picked up
> > until 10. I think that other SD_ASYM patch-set replaces 11 and 12,
> > right?
> >
> 11 is no longer needed, but AFAICT we still need 12 - we don't want
> PREFER_SIBLING to interfere with asymmetric systems.

Yes, we still want patch 12 if possible.