[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hd0v3pkyj.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:56:52 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "Agrawal, Akshu" <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Alexander.Deucher@....com,
djkurtz@...omium.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: soc-pcm: Use delay set in pointer function
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:51:15 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:29:35PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > > > However since it's not supposed to be providing any DMA a CPU DAI really
> > > > > shouldn't be doing this...
>
> > > > Well, if so, the CPU dai also cannot get the exact base delay
> > > > corresponding to the reported position, either, no?
>
> > > It can know how much delay it's adding internally between its input and
> > > output, which feeds into the overall delay experienced by the user.
>
> > But isn't it merely the additional delay that should be applied on top
> > of the existing runtime->delay?
>
> Yes. I'm saying that if the CPU DAI thinks it can figure out the base
> delay something is confused.
Then basically Akshu's patch does the correct thing, I suppose.
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists