[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <026b057d-ec11-9273-40bc-072a8958bb64@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 20:06:40 -0700
From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
mhocko@...e.com, jack@...e.cz, jglisse@...hat.com,
mike.kravetz@...cle.com, dave@...olabs.net, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc/shm.c add ->pagesize function to shm_vm_ops
Hi, Mathew,
On 7/28/2018 12:02 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 03:17:27PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>> @@ -387,6 +387,13 @@ enum page_entry_size {
>> * These are the virtual MM functions - opening of an area, closing and
>> * unmapping it (needed to keep files on disk up-to-date etc), pointer
>> * to the functions called when a no-page or a wp-page exception occurs.
>> + *
>> + * Note, when a new function is introduced to vm_operations_struct and
>> + * added to hugetlb_vm_ops, please consider adding the function to
>> + * shm_vm_ops. This is because under System V memory model, though
>> + * mappings created via shmget/shmat with "huge page" specified are
>> + * backed by hugetlbfs files, their original vm_ops are overwritten with
>> + * shm_vm_ops.
>> */
>> struct vm_operations_struct {
> I don't think this header file is the right place for this comment.
> I'd think a better place for it would be at the definition of hugetlb_vm_ops.
Agreed, will make the change.
Thanks for reviewing!
-jane
Powered by blists - more mailing lists