[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E6A8E911-491D-4185-A5FC-AD2B53037C71@mentor.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 18:51:01 +0000
From: "Davis, George" <George_Davis@...tor.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "Davis, George" <George_Davis@...tor.com>,
"Wang, Jiada (ESD)" <Jiada_Wang@...tor.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"erosca@...adit-jv.com" <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] sched/debug: fix potential deadlock when write to
sched_features
> On Jul 31, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:12:22PM +0900, jiada_wang@...tor.com wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> index 60caf1fb94e0..7b2997d4a349 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> @@ -87,21 +87,21 @@ struct static_key sched_feat_keys[__SCHED_FEAT_NR] = {
>>
>> #undef SCHED_FEAT
>>
>> -static void sched_feat_disable(int i)
>> +static void sched_feat_disable_cpuslocked(int i)
>> {
>> - static_key_disable(&sched_feat_keys[i]);
>> + static_key_disable_cpuslocked(&sched_feat_keys[i]);
>> }
>>
>> -static void sched_feat_enable(int i)
>> +static void sched_feat_enable_cpuslocked(int i)
>> {
>> - static_key_enable(&sched_feat_keys[i]);
>> + static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&sched_feat_keys[i]);
>> }
>> #else
>> -static void sched_feat_disable(int i) { };
>> -static void sched_feat_enable(int i) { };
>> +static void sched_feat_disable_cpuslocked(int i) { };
>> +static void sched_feat_enable_cpuslocked(int i) { };
>> #endif /* HAVE_JUMP_LABEL */
>>
>> -static int sched_feat_set(char *cmp)
>> +static int sched_feat_set_cpuslocked(char *cmp)
>> {
>> int i;
>> int neg = 0;
>> @@ -117,10 +117,10 @@ static int sched_feat_set(char *cmp)
>>
>> if (neg) {
>> sysctl_sched_features &= ~(1UL << i);
>> - sched_feat_disable(i);
>> + sched_feat_disable_cpuslocked(i);
>> } else {
>> sysctl_sched_features |= (1UL << i);
>> - sched_feat_enable(i);
>> + sched_feat_enable_cpuslocked(i);
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -146,9 +146,11 @@ sched_feat_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>>
>> /* Ensure the static_key remains in a consistent state */
>> inode = file_inode(filp);
>> + cpus_read_lock();
>> inode_lock(inode);
>> - ret = sched_feat_set(cmp);
>> + ret = sched_feat_set_cpuslocked(cmp);
>> inode_unlock(inode);
>> + cpus_read_unlock();
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>
> I've made that..
>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -89,12 +89,12 @@ struct static_key sched_feat_keys[__SCHE
>
> static void sched_feat_disable(int i)
> {
> - static_key_disable(&sched_feat_keys[i]);
> + static_key_disable_cpuslocked(&sched_feat_keys[i]);
> }
>
> static void sched_feat_enable(int i)
> {
> - static_key_enable(&sched_feat_keys[i]);
> + static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&sched_feat_keys[i]);
> }
> #else
> static void sched_feat_disable(int i) { };
> @@ -146,9 +146,11 @@ sched_feat_write(struct file *filp, cons
>
> /* Ensure the static_key remains in a consistent state */
> inode = file_inode(filp);
> + cpus_read_lock();
> inode_lock(inode);
> ret = sched_feat_set(cmp);
> inode_unlock(inode);
> + cpus_read_unlock();
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
For the record, for both Jiada's v2 and Peter's simplified versions:
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: George G. Davis <george_davis@...tor.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists