[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180731205003.GA3277@techadventures.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:50:03 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...hadventures.net>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, osalvador@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: make __paginginit based on CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:23:33AM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> Yes we free meminit when no CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> See here:
> http://src.illumos.org/source/xref/linux-master/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h#107
Oh, I got the point now.
Somehow I missed that we were freeing up the memory when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
was not in place.
So your patch makes sense to me now, sorry.
Since my patchset [1] + cleanup patch [2] remove almost all __paginginit,
leaving only pgdat_init_internals() and zone_init_internals(), I think
it would be great if you base your patch on top of that.
Or since the patchset has some cleanups already, I could add your patch
into it (as we did for the zone_to/set_nid() patch) and send a v6 with it.
What do you think?
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10548861/
[2] <20180731101752.GA473@...hadventures.net>
Thanks
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists