[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180801165030.007050594@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 18:46:00 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 025/336] NFSv4.1: Fix the client behaviour on NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY
4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
[ Upstream commit f9312a541050007ec59eb0106273a0a10718cd83 ]
If the server returns NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY or NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
then it thinks we're trying to replay an existing request. If so, then
let's just bump the sequence ID and retry the operation.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -746,6 +746,13 @@ static int nfs41_sequence_process(struct
slot->slot_nr,
slot->seq_nr);
goto out_retry;
+ case -NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP:
+ case -NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY:
+ /*
+ * The server thinks we tried to replay a request.
+ * Retry the call after bumping the sequence ID.
+ */
+ goto retry_new_seq;
case -NFS4ERR_BADSLOT:
/*
* The slot id we used was probably retired. Try again
@@ -770,10 +777,6 @@ static int nfs41_sequence_process(struct
goto retry_nowait;
}
goto session_recover;
- case -NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY:
- if (interrupted)
- goto retry_new_seq;
- goto session_recover;
default:
/* Just update the slot sequence no. */
slot->seq_done = 1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists