linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI/portdrv: Add support for sharing xilinx controller irq with AER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 11:05:09 -0700
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
To:     Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, rgummal@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI/portdrv: Add support for sharing xilinx
 controller irq with AER

On 8/1/2018 9:44 AM, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> Xilinx ZynqMP PS PCIe does not report AER interrupts using Advanced
> Error Interrupt Message Number. The controller has dedicated interrupt line
> for reporting PCIe errors along with AER.
> 
> Using dedicated controller irq number for AER which is shared with misc
> interrupt handler in pcie-xilinx-nwl. This irq number is set
> using PCI quirk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada<bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c |    4 ++++
>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index e0261ad..fa9150e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,10 @@ static int pcie_device_init(struct pci_dev *pdev, int service, int irq)
>   	int retval;
>   	struct pcie_device *pcie;
>   	struct device *device;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP) && defined(CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_NWL)
> +	if (service == PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER && pdev->sysdata)
> +		irq = *(int *)pdev->sysdata;
> +#endif
>   

I remember seeing a similar patch before. The patch above looks ugly to
be honest. Need to find a way to generalize this. Can you search the
mailing list archive to find out what the history is?