[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180801160320.3a4c63f7@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 16:03:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Erica Bugden <erica.bugden@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
anna-maria@...utronix.de, bigeasy@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Add missing check for existing hwlat thread
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 21:59:38 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > This looks like it is treating the symptom and not the disease.
>
> My bad. We looked at the other instances of tracers and they all have
> protection against this kind of call sequence ...
Probably because they were all fixing the symptom ;-)
I'm going to keep Erica's patch and add a WARN_ON() to it just in case.
But can you still check if the patch I gave fixes it too?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists