linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ASoC: dt-bindings: add dt bindings for wcd9335 audio codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 16:20:20 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ASoC: dt-bindings: add dt bindings for wcd9335
 audio codec

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:57 AM Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 31/07/18 21:43, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> +
> >> +- reset-gpio:
> > reset-gpios
> >
> Yep, reset-gpios makes more inline with others!
> >> +    Usage: required
> >> +    Value type: <String Array>
> >> +    Definition: Reset gpio line
> >> +
> >> +- qcom,ifd:
> >> +    Usage: required
> >> +    Value type: <phandle>
> >> +    Definition: SLIM interface device
> > Wouldn't this be the parent?
> >
> No, Interface device is just like other slim device and is part of
> SLIMbus Component and has a unique address. Every SLIMbus component has
> one interface device.

I still don't understand what this means. If this is SLIMbus specific,
then maybe it should be named that way? Or it is QCom specific?

Rob