[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <864lgey2ja.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 08:22:17 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures
On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 07:02:25 +0100,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain; ISO-8859-15 (7bit)>]
> On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 06:35 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >
> > Is it something that is reproducible with the current mainline (non-RT)?
>
> These waters are a bit muddy, it's config dependent. I'm trying to
> generate a reproducing !RT config for -rc7 as we speak. If I build
> openSUSE/master-default, it does NOT reproduce. That with the bisect
> config just finished building, and.... yup, it reproduced
> (attached).
Thanks for that.
>
> Every RT tree 4.16..master.today reproduces, and is fixed up (modulo
> the RT specific failure) by reverting the fingered commit.
>
> > Pretty worrying. What HW is that on?
>
> Box is a 4 node/64 core TaiShan 2280.
Is that what is also known as D05/HIP07, with 64 Cortex-A72? If so, I
think we have one somewhere... I'll try to reproduce it once I'm back
into the office (things seem to run just fine on my A72-based laptop,
so it definitely smells of being config dependent).
Cheers,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists