[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17f1c1b1c6d3a83dd1df130420057d3b@agner.ch>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:51:42 +0200
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, pdeschrijver@...dia.co,
marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: readd gpio-ranges properties
On 01.08.2018 22:51, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 July 2018 18:40:25 MSK Stefan Agner wrote:
>> The properties have been commented out to prevent a regression a
>> while ago. The first regression should be resolved by
>> commit 44af7927316e ("spi: Map SPI OF client IRQ at probe time").
>>
>> The second regression is probably addressed by
>> commit 494fd7b7ad10 ("PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend resume
>> order") and/or maybe others. Readd the gpio-ranges properties to see
>> whether regressions still get reported.
>>
>> This reverts commit 4f1d841475e1f6e9e32496dda11215db56f4ea73
>> ("ARM: tegra: Comment out gpio-ranges properties").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>> ---
>
> Unfortunately the second regression hasn't been addressed yet, this patch
> still breaks wake-up using GPIO key. BTW, better to spell "readd" as "re-add".
You do have the hardware and could test it?
Hm, that is unfortunate. I think this was the patch which should address
the issue:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/10/218
--
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists