linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:00:54 -0700
From:   James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1

On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 15:52 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 15:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 05:58:52PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Changes since 20180731:
> > > 
> > > The pci tree gained a conflict against the pci-current tree.
> > > 
> > > The net-next tree gained a conflict against the bpf tree.
> > > 
> > > The block tree lost its build failure.
> > > 
> > > The staging tree still had its build failure due to an
> > > interaction
> > > with
> > > the vfs tree for which I disabled CONFIG_EROFS_FS.
> > > 
> > > The kspp tree lost its build failure.
> > > 
> > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 10070
> > >  9137 files changed, 417605 insertions(+), 179996 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -----------
> > > 
> > 
> > The widespread kernel hang issues are still seen. I managed
> > to bisect it after working around the transient build failures.
> > Bisect log is attached below. Unfortunately, it doesn't help much.
> > The culprit is reported as:
> > 
> > 2d542828c5e9 Merge remote-tracking branch 'scsi/for-next'
> > 
> > The preceding merge,
> > 
> > 453f1d821165 Merge remote-tracking branch 'cgroup/for-next'
> > 
> > checks out fine, as does the tip of scsi-next (commit 103c7b7e0184,
> > "Merge branch 'misc' into for-next"). No idea how to proceed.

So what seems to be happening to cause this is that there's a patch
somewhere between the merge base of my scsi-next series and the next
tree and the patch just before scsi-next was actually merged that
actually causes a boot failure with blk-mq enabled.  Could you try to
find this patch?  I think the way to do it is to try to bisect this
range of linux-next using the command line

scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1

Which forces block mq to be the default and seeing where the first boot
failure is (you don't need my scsi-next tree merged to do this because
all the offending patch does is flip the default state of the above
flag).

James