linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] aio: add a iocb refcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180801231956.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 2 Aug 2018 00:19:56 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] aio: add a iocb refcount

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 09:15:42AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This is needed to prevent races caused by the way the ->poll API works.
> To avoid introducing overhead for other users of the iocbs we initialize
> it to zero and only do refcount operations if it is non-zero in the
> completion path.

refcount_t looks like a bad match - you, AFAICS, have count 0 for everything
except poll, while for poll you start with 2.  That looks like
	if (iocb->shared && test_and_clear_bit(0, &iocb->shared))
		return;
	kill the sucker
in your iocb_put() and initializing it to 1 in poll.  No?