[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B610A7A.5000909@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:18:50 +0800
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To: <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/bpf/libbpf: Simplify the code by using PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
On 2018/8/1 0:30, zhong jiang wrote:
> Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO is better than the open code.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 40211b5..9b61468 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -2271,9 +2271,7 @@ struct bpf_map *
>
> long libbpf_get_error(const void *ptr)
> {
> - if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> - return PTR_ERR(ptr);
> - return 0;
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(ptr);
> }
>
> int bpf_prog_load(const char *file, enum bpf_prog_type type,
I am so sorry for that. I will repost it after check it correct carefully.
Thanks
zhong jiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists