[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa58e248-8d03-2932-8888-25497bcbdfc3@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 18:33:20 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@...c.org, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
msalter@...hat.com, jacquiot.aurelien@...il.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama@...gle.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Getting the instruction pointer on a per arch basis
On 07/31/2018 04:09 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> + More maintainers and lists for visibility
>
Ideally the linux-arch@...r.kernel.org mailing list would be sufficient,
but I doubt that it is. :(
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists