[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb0a5e82-a67d-4176-12e6-607fb17a4e5d@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 16:27:49 +0800
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>, <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] driver/scsi/pmcraid: Use pci_zalloc_consistent instead
of pci_alloc_consistent+memset
在 2018/8/1 15:16, zhong jiang 写道:
> Pci_zalloc_consistent is better than pci_alloc_consistent+memset,
> and it make the code concise
Aren't these APIs deprecated:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/381
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
> index 4e86994..8a6facc 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
> @@ -4736,11 +4736,9 @@ static int pmcraid_allocate_host_rrqs(struct pmcraid_instance *pinstance)
> buffer_size = HRRQ_ENTRY_SIZE * PMCRAID_MAX_CMD;
>
> for (i = 0; i < pinstance->num_hrrq; i++) {
> - pinstance->hrrq_start[i] =
> - pci_alloc_consistent(
> - pinstance->pdev,
> - buffer_size,
> - &(pinstance->hrrq_start_bus_addr[i]));
> + pinstance->hrrq_start[i] = pci_zalloc_consistent(pinstance->pdev,
> + buffer_size,
> + &(pinstance->hrrq_start_bus_addr[i]));
>
> if (!pinstance->hrrq_start[i]) {
> pmcraid_err("pci_alloc failed for hrrq vector : %d\n",
> @@ -4749,7 +4747,6 @@ static int pmcraid_allocate_host_rrqs(struct pmcraid_instance *pinstance)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - memset(pinstance->hrrq_start[i], 0, buffer_size);
> pinstance->hrrq_curr[i] = pinstance->hrrq_start[i];
> pinstance->hrrq_end[i] =
> pinstance->hrrq_start[i] + PMCRAID_MAX_CMD - 1;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists