linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] ASoC: wcd9335: add basic controls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bbee4cb6-286d-c774-9b44-267d0af25af3@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:57:12 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com, bgoswami@...eaurora.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] ASoC: wcd9335: add basic controls

Thanks for the review.

On 31/07/18 18:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:18:02PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> 
>> +static const char * const wcd9335_ear_pa_gain_text[] = {
>> +	"G_6_DB", "G_4P5_DB", "G_3_DB", "G_1P5_DB",
>> +	"G_0_DB", "G_M2P5_DB", "UNDEFINED", "G_M12_DB"
>> +};
> 
> This is fairly clearly a volume control so shouldn't be an enum.  I
> don't think we have a standard control that enables you to skip values
> in a regular volume control (we do for enums which you should've used
> rather than having the undefined entry) so you'd have to have custom get
> and put operators but that's better than abusing an enum.
I agree, this can be a TLV, I will fix any such instances in next version.
> 
>> +static const char * const rx_hph_mode_mux_text[] = {
>> +	"CLS_H_INVALID", "CLS_H_HIFI", "CLS_H_LP", "CLS_AB", "CLS_H_LOHIFI"
>> +};
> 
> Use a SOC_VALUE_ENUM to hide the invalid option from users.
Yep.
> 
>> +	wcd->comp_enabled[comp] = value;
>> +	sel = value ? WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_COMPANDER :
>> +		WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_REGISTER;
> 
> Just write normal if statements unless there's a reason not to, it's
> easier to read.
Will do that in next version.

thanks,
srini
>