linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [nfsd4] 517dc52baa: fsmark.files_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180801114642.GA21500@parsley.fieldses.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 07:46:47 -0400
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
To:     Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        lkp@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [nfsd4] 517dc52baa: fsmark.files_per_sec 32.4%
 improvement

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 08:22:25AM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> On 07/16, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> >On 07/04, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >>"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:52:43PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >>>> FYI, we noticed a 32.4% improvement of fsmark.files_per_sec due to commit:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> commit: 517dc52baa2a508c82f68bbc7219b48169e6b29f ("nfsd4: shortern default lease period")
> >>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> >>>
> >>> That doesn't make any sense....
> >>>
> >>> OK, I think I see the problem:
> >>>
> >>>> in testcase: fsmark
> >>>> on test machine: 48 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz with 64G memory
> >>>> with following parameters:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 	iterations: 1x
> >>>> 	nr_threads: 1t
> >>>> 	disk: 1BRD_48G
> >>>> 	fs: f2fs
> >>>> 	fs2: nfsv4
> >>>> 	filesize: 4M
> >>>> 	test_size: 40G
> >>>> 	sync_method: fsyncBeforeClose
> >>>> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
> >>>> 
> >>>> test-description: The fsmark is a file system benchmark to test synchronous write workloads, for example, mail servers workload.
> >>>> test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/fsmark/
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Details are as below:
> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> To reproduce:
> >>>> 
> >>>>         git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
> >>>>         cd lkp-tests
> >>>>         bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
> >>>>         bin/lkp run     job.yaml
> >>>> 
> >>>> =========================================================================================
> >>>> compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/filesize/fs2/fs/iterations/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/sync_method/tbox_group/test_size/testcase:
> >>>>   gcc-7/performance/1BRD_48G/4M/nfsv4/f2fs/1x/x86_64-rhel-7.2/1t/debian-x86_64-2016-08-31.cgz/fsyncBeforeClose/ivb44/40G/fsmark
> >>>> 
> >>>> commit: 
> >>>>   c2993a1d7d ("nfsd4: extend reclaim period for reclaiming clients")
> >>>>   517dc52baa ("nfsd4: shortern default lease period")
> >>>> 
> >>>> c2993a1d7d6687fd 517dc52baa2a508c82f68bbc72 
> >>>> ---------------- -------------------------- 
> >>>>          %stddev     %change         %stddev
> >>>>              \          |                \  
> >>>>      53.60           +32.4%      70.95        fsmark.files_per_sec
> >>>>     191.89           -24.4%     145.16        fsmark.time.elapsed_time
> >>>>     191.89           -24.4%     145.16        fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max
> >>>
> >>> So what happened is the test took about 45 seconds less.
> >>>
> >>> I suspect you're starting the nfs server and then immediately running
> >>> this test.
> >>
> >>Yes.
> >>
> >>> The problem is that if there's a grace period on startup, any open will
> >>> just hang until the grace period ends.
> >>>
> >>> This patch changed the default grace period from 90 seconds to 45, so
> >>> that would explain the change.
> >>>
> >>> In my testing I usually 
> >>>
> >>> 	start the nfs server
> >>> 	on the client:
> >>> 		mount the server
> >>> 		touch a file
> >>>
> >>> When the touch returns, I know any grace period has completed, and then
> >>> I can run any tests normally.
> >>
> >
> >I've modified our test to touch a file before running the actual workload, then
> >requeue tests for both commit 517dc52baa and its parent c2993a1d7d, but the
> >result seems persistent which shows a ~30% improvement of fsmark.files_per_sec.
> >
> 
> Any suggestions?

You're sure you only start timing after the "touch" returns?

--b.