[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180801165020.433413561@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 18:51:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 182/246] delayacct: Use raw_spinlocks
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
[ Upstream commit 02acc80d19edb0d5684c997b2004ad19f9f5236e ]
try_to_wake_up() might invoke delayacct_blkio_end() while holding the
pi_lock (which is a raw_spinlock_t). delayacct_blkio_end() acquires
task_delay_info.lock which is a spinlock_t. This causes a might sleep splat
on -RT where non raw spinlocks are converted to 'sleeping' spinlocks.
task_delay_info.lock is only held for a short amount of time so it's not a
problem latency wise to make convert it to a raw spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180423161024.6710-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/delayacct.h | 2 +-
kernel/delayacct.c | 17 +++++++++--------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/delayacct.h
+++ b/include/linux/delayacct.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
struct task_delay_info {
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
unsigned int flags; /* Private per-task flags */
/* For each stat XXX, add following, aligned appropriately
--- a/kernel/delayacct.c
+++ b/kernel/delayacct.c
@@ -44,23 +44,24 @@ void __delayacct_tsk_init(struct task_st
{
tsk->delays = kmem_cache_zalloc(delayacct_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (tsk->delays)
- spin_lock_init(&tsk->delays->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&tsk->delays->lock);
}
/*
* Finish delay accounting for a statistic using its timestamps (@start),
* accumalator (@total) and @count
*/
-static void delayacct_end(spinlock_t *lock, u64 *start, u64 *total, u32 *count)
+static void delayacct_end(raw_spinlock_t *lock, u64 *start, u64 *total,
+ u32 *count)
{
s64 ns = ktime_get_ns() - *start;
unsigned long flags;
if (ns > 0) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
*total += ns;
(*count)++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
}
}
@@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ int __delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats
/* zero XXX_total, non-zero XXX_count implies XXX stat overflowed */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
tmp = d->blkio_delay_total + tsk->delays->blkio_delay;
d->blkio_delay_total = (tmp < d->blkio_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
tmp = d->swapin_delay_total + tsk->delays->swapin_delay;
@@ -137,7 +138,7 @@ int __delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats
d->blkio_count += tsk->delays->blkio_count;
d->swapin_count += tsk->delays->swapin_count;
d->freepages_count += tsk->delays->freepages_count;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -147,10 +148,10 @@ __u64 __delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct tas
__u64 ret;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
ret = nsec_to_clock_t(tsk->delays->blkio_delay +
tsk->delays->swapin_delay);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists