[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c99a75a2905c1eef50f94ccc0871c36af431e21a.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 03:26:09 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhongjiang@...wei.com" <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"fthain@...egraphics.com.au" <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
"schmitzmic@...il.com" <schmitzmic@...il.com>
CC: "andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"john.garry@...wei.com" <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi:NCR5380: remove same check condition in
NCR5380_select
On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 11:10 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> The same check condition is redundant, so remove one of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
> index 90ea0f5..2ecaf3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
> @@ -999,8 +999,7 @@ static struct scsi_cmnd *NCR5380_select(struct Scsi_Host *instance,
>
> /* Check for lost arbitration */
> if ((NCR5380_read(INITIATOR_COMMAND_REG) & ICR_ARBITRATION_LOST) ||
> - (NCR5380_read(CURRENT_SCSI_DATA_REG) & hostdata->id_higher_mask) ||
> - (NCR5380_read(INITIATOR_COMMAND_REG) & ICR_ARBITRATION_LOST)) {
> + (NCR5380_read(CURRENT_SCSI_DATA_REG) & hostdata->id_higher_mask)) {
> NCR5380_write(MODE_REG, MR_BASE);
> dsprintk(NDEBUG_ARBITRATION, instance, "lost arbitration, deasserting MR_ARBITRATE\n");
> spin_lock_irq(&hostdata->lock);
Has this patch been tested?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists