[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180802002606.42766-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 17:26:06 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Ignore turbo active ratio in HWP
When HWP is active turbo active ratio is not used, so we should allow
policy max frequency above turbo activation ratio to be set. When HWP is
not active, then any policy max frequency above turbo activation ratio
can result upto max one-core turbo frequency.
This fix helps better thermal control in turbo region when other methods
like "Running Average Power Limit" is not available to use.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index efb015a5f7ac..32c10e69241e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2020,7 +2020,8 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static void intel_pstate_adjust_policy_max(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpudata *cpu)
{
- if (cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical > cpu->pstate.max_pstate &&
+ if (!hwp_active &&
+ cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical > cpu->pstate.max_pstate &&
policy->max < policy->cpuinfo.max_freq &&
policy->max > cpu->pstate.max_freq) {
pr_debug("policy->max > max non turbo frequency\n");
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists