[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180802061518.GD3272@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 08:15:18 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 05:09:13PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 2018/7/30 14:31, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On 2018/7/30 14:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> After merging the staging tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >>
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_read_super':
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:17: error: 'MS_RDONLY' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IS_RDONLY'?
> >> sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY | MS_NOATIME;
> >> ^~~~~~~~~
> >> IS_RDONLY
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:17: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:29: error: 'MS_NOATIME' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'S_NOATIME'?
> >> sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY | MS_NOATIME;
> >> ^~~~~~~~~~
> >> S_NOATIME
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_mount':
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:501:10: warning: passing argument 5 of 'mount_bdev' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> >> &priv, erofs_fill_super);
> >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:0,
> >> from drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:14:
> >> include/linux/fs.h:2151:23: note: expected 'size_t {aka long unsigned int}' but argument is of type 'int (*)(struct super_block *, void *, int)'
> >> extern struct dentry *mount_bdev(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> >> ^~~~~~~~~~
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:500:9: error: too few arguments to function 'mount_bdev'
> >> return mount_bdev(fs_type, flags, dev_name,
> >> ^~~~~~~~~~
> >> In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:0,
> >> from drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:14:
> >> include/linux/fs.h:2151:23: note: declared here
> >> extern struct dentry *mount_bdev(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> >> ^~~~~~~~~~
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: At top level:
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:518:20: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >> .mount = erofs_mount,
> >> ^~~~~~~~~~~
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:518:20: note: (near initialization for 'erofs_fs_type.mount')
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_remount':
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:630:12: error: 'MS_RDONLY' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IS_RDONLY'?
> >> *flags |= MS_RDONLY;
> >> ^~~~~~~~~
> >> IS_RDONLY
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: At top level:
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:640:16: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >> .remount_fs = erofs_remount,
> >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Caused by various commits creating erofs in the staging tree interacting
> >> with various commits redoing the mount infrastructure in the vfs tree.
> >>
> >> I have disabed CONFIG_EROFS_FS for now:
>
> Xiang has submitted several patches as below to fix compiling error on -next
> tree, could you consider to merge those temporary fixes into -next after merging
> staging-next's updates, and reenable CONFIG_EROFS_FS for further integrity
> compiling and test?
>
> staging: erofs: fix superblock/inode flags (MS_RDONLY -> SB_RDONLY, S_NOATIME)
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/2018-July/000282.html
>
> staging: erofs: remove RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_{ENTRY, SHIFT}
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/2018-July/000283.html
>
> staging: erofs: update .mount and .remount_sb
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/2018-July/000285.html
Why have these not been submitted to me for inclusion in my tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists