[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <292fb788-fa5a-8106-efbb-e1fa825f5697@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 08:34:55 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] mfd: wcd9335: add wcd irq support
Thanks for review,
On 01/08/18 23:17, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:57 AM Srinivas Kandagatla
> <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the review,
>>
>> On 31/07/18 21:45, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:17:59PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>>> WCD9335 supports two lines of irqs INTR1 and INTR2.
>>>> Multiple interrupts are muxed via these lines.
>>>> INTR1 consists of all possible interrupt sources like:
>>>> Ear OCP, HPH OCP, MBHC, MAD, VBAT, and SVA
>>>> INTR2 is a subset of first interrupt sources like MAD, VBAT, and SVA
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
>>>> drivers/mfd/wcd9335-core.c | 9 ++
>>>> drivers/mfd/wcd9335-irq.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> include/dt-bindings/mfd/wcd9335.h | 43 +++++++++
>>>
>>> I'm confused why these are defined here. The binding for the wc9335 is
>>> not an interrupt-controller.
>>
>> I can move this defines to include/linux/mfd/wcd9335/wcd9335.h as there
>> are no active users for this, but I was hoping that these can be used
>> in DT in future.
>>
>> WCD9335 is an interrupt controller too. It muxes multiple interrupts via
>> a gpio line interrupt.
>>
>> I did mention this in the bindings.
>
> Then the header belongs in the binding patch.
>
> I don't recall child nodes being defined though and you don't need to
> be a interrupt-controller (in DT) without them.
Sure, I will fix it in next version.
Thanks,
srini
>
> Rob
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists