[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180802084222.xa3uwxld5en3cfzx@kili.mountain>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 11:42:22 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] misc: mic: SCIF Fix scif_get_new_port() error handling
There are only 2 callers of scif_get_new_port() and both appear to get
the error handling wrong. Both treat zero returns as error, but it
actually returns negative error codes and >= 0 on success.
Fixes: e9089f43c9a7 ("misc: mic: SCIF open close bind and listen APIs")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
I have not tested this patch. Please review carefully.
diff --git a/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_api.c b/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_api.c
index 463f06d0b4ef..8dd0ccedeb94 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_api.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_api.c
@@ -371,11 +371,10 @@ int scif_bind(scif_epd_t epd, u16 pn)
goto scif_bind_exit;
}
} else {
- pn = scif_get_new_port();
- if (!pn) {
- ret = -ENOSPC;
+ ret = scif_get_new_port();
+ if (ret < 0)
goto scif_bind_exit;
- }
+ pn = ret;
}
ep->state = SCIFEP_BOUND;
@@ -649,13 +648,12 @@ int __scif_connect(scif_epd_t epd, struct scif_port_id *dst, bool non_block)
err = -EISCONN;
break;
case SCIFEP_UNBOUND:
- ep->port.port = scif_get_new_port();
- if (!ep->port.port) {
- err = -ENOSPC;
- } else {
- ep->port.node = scif_info.nodeid;
- ep->conn_async_state = ASYNC_CONN_IDLE;
- }
+ err = scif_get_new_port();
+ if (err < 0)
+ break;
+ ep->port.port = err;
+ ep->port.node = scif_info.nodeid;
+ ep->conn_async_state = ASYNC_CONN_IDLE;
/* Fall through */
case SCIFEP_BOUND:
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists