[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180802100505.56e663cb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 10:05:05 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1
Hi all,
On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:00:54 -0700 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> So what seems to be happening to cause this is that there's a patch
> somewhere between the merge base of my scsi-next series and the next
> tree and the patch just before scsi-next was actually merged that
> actually causes a boot failure with blk-mq enabled. Could you try to
> find this patch? I think the way to do it is to try to bisect this
> range of linux-next using the command line
>
> scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1
>
> Which forces block mq to be the default and seeing where the first boot
> failure is (you don't need my scsi-next tree merged to do this because
> all the offending patch does is flip the default state of the above
> flag).
So this means using v4.8-rc1 as the first good commit and 453f1d821165
("Merge remote-tracking branch 'cgroup/for-next'") as the first bad
(assuming that this latter fails to boot with "scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists