[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153320759911.18959.8842396230157677671.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 14:00:52 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com,
vdavydov.dev@...il.com, mhocko@...e.com, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
ying.huang@...el.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
willy@...radead.org, shakeelb@...gle.com, jbacik@...com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: Move check for SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE to do_shrink_slab()
In case of shrink_slab_memcg() we do not zero nid, when shrinker
is not numa-aware. This is not a real problem, since currently
all memcg-aware shrinkers are numa-aware too (we have two:
super_block shrinker and workingset shrinker), but something may
change in the future.
(Andrew, this may be merged to mm-iterate-only-over-charged-shrinkers-during-memcg-shrink_slab)
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index ea0a46166e8e..0d980e801b8a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -455,6 +455,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
: SHRINK_BATCH;
long scanned = 0, next_deferred;
+ if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
+ nid = 0;
+
freeable = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
if (freeable == 0 || freeable == SHRINK_EMPTY)
return freeable;
@@ -680,9 +683,6 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
.memcg = memcg,
};
- if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
- sc.nid = 0;
-
ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
ret = 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists