[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <988e86c6-92bb-b73d-068b-04dfbc0fffda@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 13:39:37 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clockevents: warn if cpu_all_mask is used for cpumask
while registering new device
Hi Thomas,
On 11/07/18 12:24, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Using cpu_all_mask in clockevents cpumask may result in issues while
> comparing multiple clockevent devices to choose the preferred one.
> On one of the platforms with 2 system(i.e. non per-CPU) timers with
> different ratings, having cpu_all_mask for one of the device resulted
> in boot hang with forever loop in clockevents_notify_released as both
> were being selected as preferred.
>
> In order to prevent such issues in future, let's warn if any clockevent
> drivers sets cpu_all_mask as it's cpumask and just override it to use
> cpu_possible_mask. All the existing occurrences of cpu_all_mask are
> already replaced with cpu_possible_mask.
>
Daniel has picked up patch 1/3, do you want me to resend this patch 2
and 3 again or you happy to pick them ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists