linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b1616769-b1d7-97c7-b197-9dc3d0f74a7b@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 2 Aug 2018 06:00:19 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
        "James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com" 
        <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "tom.leiming@...il.com" <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
        "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1

On 08/02/2018 05:51 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 05:46:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> This is consistent across multiple test runs. In summary,
>>
>> - Boot from initrd fails
>> - Boot from SATA drive fails (this is with CONFIG_ATA)
>> - Boot from NVME fails
>> - Boot from USB drive fails
>> - Boot from MMC (SD) fails
>> - Boot from USB UAS drive passes
>> - Boot from various real SCSI drives passes
>>
>> Platform (pc,q35), CPU type, or SMP/NOSMP does not seem to make a difference.
> 
> OK. I try to bisect between next-20180727 (known good) and
> next-20180731 (known bad) with forced scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1, but so
> far the only bad I've seen is next-20180731.
> 

Per my logs, next-20180730 is the first bad, next-20180727 is the last good.

Guenter