[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9329f50c734eec5fa994ea652890f017a88625c2.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 16:40:10 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tom.leiming@...il.com" <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"josef@...icpanda.com" <josef@...icpanda.com>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1
On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 00:27 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This issue can be fixed by reverting d250bf4e776ff09d5 ("blk-mq: only iterate over
> inflight requests in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter").
>
> This patch looks wrong, because 'blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT'
> isn't completely same with 'blk_mq_request_started(req)'.
Please test the following change instead of reverting the commit mentioned
above:
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 09b2ee6694fb..25a0583d8b4c 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
* test and set the bit before assining ->rqs[].
*/
rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
- if (rq && blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT)
+ if (rq && blk_mq_rq_state(rq) != MQ_RQ_IDLE)
iter_data->fn(rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
return true;
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists