linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom,eud

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJMouUOpb-ZcBqydKCHuF5MmODSdGOoneO+w5oD5AaCZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Aug 2018 15:23:16 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     pheragu@...eaurora.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>, ckadabi@...eaurora.org,
        bryanh@...eaurora.org, psodagud@...eaurora.org,
        satyap@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom,eud

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 12:44 PM <pheragu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On 2018-08-01 07:04, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:22 PM Prakruthi Deepak Heragu
> > <pheragu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Documentation for Embedded USB Debugger (EUD) device tree bindings.
> >
> > If you want bindings reviewed, send them to the correct list and
> > people (hint: run get_maintainers.pl).
> >
> > New bindings should not use extcon.
> >
> Why should we not use extcon?

Because it is poorly designed and has things which are Linux specific.

> Are there any alternatives which you
> would suggest? We were looking at graphs instead of extcon.

There's a usb-connector binding now which does use graphs.

But I'm not really sure what this should look like given this appears
to be both a USB device and a MMIO device.

Rob