linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/6] sched/numa: Limit the conditions where scan period is reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1533276841-16341-7-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri,  3 Aug 2018 11:44:01 +0530
From:   Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] sched/numa: Limit the conditions where scan period is reset

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>

migrate_task_rq_fair resets the scan rate for NUMA balancing on every
cross-node migration. In the event of excessive load balancing due to
saturation, this may result in the scan rate being pegged at maximum and
further overloading the machine.

This patch only resets the scan if NUMA balancing is active, a preferred
node has been selected and the task is being migrated from the preferred
node as these are the most harmful. For example, a migration to the preferred
node does not justify a faster scan rate. Similarly, a migration between two
nodes that are not preferred is probably bouncing due to over-saturation of
the machine.  In that case, scanning faster and trapping more NUMA faults
will further overload the machine.

specjbb2005 / bops/JVM / higher bops are better
on 2 Socket/2 Node Intel
JVMS  Prev    Current  %Change
4     208862  209029   0.0799571
1     307007  326585   6.37705


on 2 Socket/4 Node Power8 (PowerNV)
JVMS  Prev     Current  %Change
8     89911.4  89627.8  -0.315422
1     216176   221299   2.36983


on 2 Socket/2 Node Power9 (PowerNV)
JVMS  Prev    Current  %Change
4     196078  195444   -0.323341
1     214664  222390   3.59911


on 4 Socket/4 Node Power7
JVMS  Prev     Current  %Change
8     60719.2  60152.4  -0.933477
1     112615   111458   -1.02739


dbench / transactions / higher numbers are better
on 2 Socket/2 Node Intel
count  Min      Max      Avg      Variance  %Change
5      12511.7  12559.4  12539.5  15.5883
5      12904.6  12969    12942.6  23.9053   3.21464


on 2 Socket/4 Node Power8 (PowerNV)
count  Min      Max      Avg      Variance  %Change
5      4709.28  4979.28  4919.32  105.126
5      4984.25  5025.95  5004.5   14.2253   1.73154


on 2 Socket/2 Node Power9 (PowerNV)
count  Min      Max      Avg      Variance  %Change
5      9388.38  9406.29  9395.1   5.98959
5      9277.64  9357.22  9322.07  26.3558   -0.77732


on 4 Socket/4 Node Power7
count  Min      Max      Avg      Variance  %Change
5      157.71   184.929  174.754  10.7275
5      160.632  175.558  168.655  5.26823   -3.49005


Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 4ea0eff..6e251e6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6357,6 +6357,9 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu __maybe_unus
 	p->se.exec_start = 0;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_numa_balancing))
+		return;
+
 	if (!p->mm || (p->flags & PF_EXITING))
 		return;
 
@@ -6364,8 +6367,26 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu __maybe_unus
 		int src_nid = cpu_to_node(task_cpu(p));
 		int dst_nid = cpu_to_node(new_cpu);
 
-		if (src_nid != dst_nid)
-			p->numa_scan_period = task_scan_start(p);
+		if (src_nid == dst_nid)
+			return;
+
+		/*
+		 * Allow resets if faults have been trapped before one scan
+		 * has completed. This is most likely due to a new task that
+		 * is pulled cross-node due to wakeups or load balancing.
+		 */
+		if (p->numa_scan_seq) {
+			/*
+			 * Avoid scan adjustments if moving to the preferred
+			 * node or if the task was not previously running on
+			 * the preferred node.
+			 */
+			if (dst_nid == p->numa_preferred_nid ||
+			    (p->numa_preferred_nid != -1 && src_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid))
+				return;
+		}
+
+		p->numa_scan_period = task_scan_start(p);
 	}
 #endif
 }
-- 
1.8.3.1