lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180803091011eucas1p29e46a12d1986f11e63547ea1ec8e8663~HVMbjcXDZ2739127391eucas1p2M@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 11:10:09 +0200
From:   Piotr Sawicki <p.sawicki2@...tner.samsung.com>
To:     Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        SE Linux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        "SMACK-discuss@...ts.01.org" <SMACK-discuss@...ts.01.org>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:     "Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 20/22] Move common usercopy into
 security_getpeersec_stream

On 07/16/2018 08:24 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> [PATCH 20/22] Move common usercopy into security_getpeersec_stream
> 
> The modules implementing hook for getpeersec_stream
> don't need to be duplicating the copy-to-user checks.
> Moving the user copy part into the infrastructure makes
> the security module code simpler and reduces the places
> where user copy code may go awry.

Hi,

This change will break the API. Some clients may call getsockopt(..,SO_PEERSEC,..) twice. Firstly, to fetch the length. In that case xxx_socket_getpeersec_stream should return -ERANGE and set *optlen. Secondly, to retrieve a proper security label.

Please take a look at the implementation of the getClientSmackLabel() function in Cynara: https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/26888/6/src/helpers/creds-socket/creds-socket-inner.cpp
Also there is an email thread about this socket option which tells us why it is made this way: "[RFC] SO_PEERSEC - security credentials for Unix stream sockets"

http://lists.jammed.com/linux-security-module/2003/12/0029.html

Regards,
Piotr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ