lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1808031340500.1745@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 13:41:13 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:     Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@...eaurora.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        isaacm@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpu stopper threads and setaffinity leads to deadlock

Prasad.

On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> So why didn't you do the 'obvious' parallel to what you did for
> cpu_stop_queue_two_works(), namely:

Is that patch fixing the issue for you?

> --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
> +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static bool cpu_stop_queue_work(unsigned
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	bool enabled;
>  
> +	preempt_disable();
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);
>  	enabled = stopper->enabled;
>  	if (enabled)
> @@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ static bool cpu_stop_queue_work(unsigned
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);
>  
>  	wake_up_q(&wakeq);
> +	preempt_enable();
>  
>  	return enabled;
>  }
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ