linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] psi: pressure stall information for CPU, memory, and IO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180803172139.GE2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:21:39 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
        Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>,
        Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] psi: pressure stall information for CPU, memory, and
 IO

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 11:19:57AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> +			time = READ_ONCE(groupc->times[s]);
> +			/*
> +			 * In addition to already concluded states, we
> +			 * also incorporate currently active states on
> +			 * the CPU, since states may last for many
> +			 * sampling periods.
> +			 *
> +			 * This way we keep our delta sampling buckets
> +			 * small (u32) and our reported pressure close
> +			 * to what's actually happening.
> +			 */
> +			if (test_state(groupc->tasks, cpu, s)) {
> +				/*
> +				 * We can race with a state change and
> +				 * need to make sure the state_start
> +				 * update is ordered against the
> +				 * updates to the live state and the
> +				 * time buckets (groupc->times).
> +				 *
> +				 * 1. If we observe task state that
> +				 * needs to be recorded, make sure we
> +				 * see state_start from when that
> +				 * state went into effect or we'll
> +				 * count time from the previous state.
> +				 *
> +				 * 2. If the time delta has already
> +				 * been added to the bucket, make sure
> +				 * we don't see it in state_start or
> +				 * we'll count it twice.
> +				 *
> +				 * If the time delta is out of
> +				 * state_start but not in the time
> +				 * bucket yet, we'll miss it entirely
> +				 * and handle it in the next period.
> +				 */
> +				smp_rmb();
> +				time += cpu_clock(cpu) - groupc->state_start;
> +			}

As is, groupc->state_start needs a READ_ONCE() above and a WRITE_ONCE()
below. But like stated earlier, doing an update in scheduler_tick() is
probably easier.

> +static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu, u64 now,
> +			     unsigned int clear, unsigned int set)
> +{
> +	struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
> +	unsigned int t, m;
> +	u32 delta;
> +
> +	groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * First we assess the aggregate resource states these CPU's
> +	 * tasks have been in since the last change, and account any
> +	 * SOME and FULL time that may have resulted in.
> +	 *
> +	 * Then we update the task counts according to the state
> +	 * change requested through the @clear and @set bits.
> +	 */
> +
> +	delta = now - groupc->state_start;
> +	groupc->state_start = now;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Update state_start before recording time in the sampling
> +	 * buckets and changing task counts, to prevent a racing
> +	 * aggregation from counting the delta twice or attributing it
> +	 * to an old state.
> +	 */
> +	smp_wmb();
> +
> +	if (test_state(groupc->tasks, cpu, PSI_IO_SOME)) {
> +		groupc->times[PSI_IO_SOME] += delta;
> +		if (test_state(groupc->tasks, cpu, PSI_IO_FULL))
> +			groupc->times[PSI_IO_FULL] += delta;
> +	}
> +	if (test_state(groupc->tasks, cpu, PSI_MEM_SOME)) {
> +		groupc->times[PSI_MEM_SOME] += delta;
> +		if (test_state(groupc->tasks, cpu, PSI_MEM_FULL))
> +			groupc->times[PSI_MEM_FULL] += delta;
> +	}

Might we worth checking the compiler does the right thing here and
optimizes this branch fest into something sensible.

> +	if (test_state(groupc->tasks, cpu, PSI_CPU_SOME))
> +		groupc->times[PSI_CPU_SOME] += delta;
> +	if (test_state(groupc->tasks, cpu, PSI_NONIDLE))
> +		groupc->times[PSI_NONIDLE] += delta;