linux-kernel - Re: LVM snapshot broke between 4.14 and 4.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzPDchiWn0sxPjO-ha1o4nYuHnE0YD+rG9LoSe4+Lt1OA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 12:36:15 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@...hat.com>, wgh@...lan.ru,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: LVM snapshot broke between 4.14 and 4.16

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:30 PM Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> I was trying to give context for the "best to update lvm2 anyway"
> disclaimer that was used.  Yeah, it was specious.

So I'll apologize for the strong words, and I'll just say - not
excuse, but explanation - that this is the *ONE* thing that continues
to drive me absolutely bat-shit insane.

It's the *ONE* thing I will refuse to even discuss. Pretty much any
technical thing, I'll happily discuss, and I'll admit when I was
completely wrong and a f*cking moron.

Hey, it happens.

But the "no regressions" thing is _so_ important to me, and _so_
frustrating when I get the feeling that people ignore it, that I just
go ballistic.

I'm sorry for going ballistic, but there it is. It keeps happening
every once in a while. I thought we'd gotten mostly over it.

                Linus