[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180803220046.4019-5-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:00:46 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Cope if shmem doesn't support zeropage
If userfaultfd runs on a system that doesn't support UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE for
shared memory, it currently ends with error code 1 which indicates test
failure:
# ./userfaultfd shmem 10 10
nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 80
bounces: 9, mode: rnd poll, unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory
# echo $?
1
Change userfaultfd_zeropage_test() to return KSFT_SKIP to indicate that
the test is being skipped.
Also change userfaultfd_events_test() and userfaultfd_stress() to ignore
the missing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE bit from the list of supported ioctls since
these tests don't require that feature.
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index c84e44ddf314..00f1ca663d67 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -852,6 +852,16 @@ static int uffdio_zeropage(int ufd, unsigned long offset)
return __uffdio_zeropage(ufd, offset, false);
}
+/* Tells whether the kernel doesn't support ZEROPAGE on shared memory VMAs. */
+static bool shmem_without_zeropage_support(unsigned long expected_ioctls,
+ unsigned long supported_ioctls)
+{
+ /* Turn off ZEROPAGE bit from expected_ioctls. */
+ expected_ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE);
+
+ return test_type == TEST_SHMEM && supported_ioctls == expected_ioctls;
+}
+
/* exercise UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE */
static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
{
@@ -877,10 +887,20 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
expected_ioctls = uffd_test_ops->expected_ioctls;
if ((uffdio_register.ioctls & expected_ioctls) !=
- expected_ioctls)
+ expected_ioctls) {
+ close(uffd);
+
+ if (shmem_without_zeropage_support(expected_ioctls,
+ uffdio_register.ioctls)) {
+ fprintf(stderr,
+ "UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE unsupported in shmem VMAs\n");
+ return KSFT_SKIP;
+ }
+
fprintf(stderr,
- "unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory\n"),
- exit(1);
+ "unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
if (uffdio_zeropage(uffd, 0)) {
if (my_bcmp(area_dst, zeropage, page_size))
@@ -924,7 +944,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void)
expected_ioctls = uffd_test_ops->expected_ioctls;
if ((uffdio_register.ioctls & expected_ioctls) !=
- expected_ioctls)
+ expected_ioctls &&
+ /* No need for zeropage support in this test, so ignore it. */
+ !shmem_without_zeropage_support(expected_ioctls,
+ uffdio_register.ioctls))
fprintf(stderr,
"unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory\n"),
exit(1);
@@ -1117,7 +1140,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
}
expected_ioctls = uffd_test_ops->expected_ioctls;
if ((uffdio_register.ioctls & expected_ioctls) !=
- expected_ioctls) {
+ expected_ioctls &&
+ /* No need for zeropage support in this test, so ignore it. */
+ !shmem_without_zeropage_support(expected_ioctls,
+ uffdio_register.ioctls)) {
fprintf(stderr,
"unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory\n");
return 1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists