linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 15/32] tcp: add one more quick ack after after ECN events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180804082650.727986379@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat,  4 Aug 2018 11:01:05 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 15/32] tcp: add one more quick ack after after ECN events

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 15ecbe94a45ef88491ca459b26efdd02f91edb6d ]

Larry Brakmo proposal ( https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/935233/
tcp: force cwnd at least 2 in tcp_cwnd_reduction) made us rethink
about our recent patch removing ~16 quick acks after ECN events.

tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 1) makes sure one immediate ack is sent,
but in the case the sender cwnd was lowered to 1, we do not want
to have a delayed ack for the next packet we will receive.

Fixes: 522040ea5fdd ("tcp: do not aggressively quick ack after ECN events")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static void __tcp_ecn_check_ce(struct so
 		 * it is probably a retransmit.
 		 */
 		if (tp->ecn_flags & TCP_ECN_SEEN)
-			tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 1);
+			tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 2);
 		break;
 	case INET_ECN_CE:
 		if (tcp_ca_needs_ecn(sk))
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static void __tcp_ecn_check_ce(struct so
 
 		if (!(tp->ecn_flags & TCP_ECN_DEMAND_CWR)) {
 			/* Better not delay acks, sender can have a very low cwnd */
-			tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 1);
+			tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 2);
 			tp->ecn_flags |= TCP_ECN_DEMAND_CWR;
 		}
 		tp->ecn_flags |= TCP_ECN_SEEN;