[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180804082651.016137898@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 11:01:11 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 21/32] net: dsa: Do not suspend/resume closed slave_dev
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit a94c689e6c9e72e722f28339e12dff191ee5a265 ]
If a DSA slave network device was previously disabled, there is no need
to suspend or resume it.
Fixes: 2446254915a7 ("net: dsa: allow switch drivers to implement suspend/resume hooks")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/dsa/slave.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -1199,6 +1199,9 @@ int dsa_slave_suspend(struct net_device
{
struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(slave_dev);
+ if (!netif_running(slave_dev))
+ return 0;
+
netif_device_detach(slave_dev);
if (p->phy) {
@@ -1216,6 +1219,9 @@ int dsa_slave_resume(struct net_device *
{
struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(slave_dev);
+ if (!netif_running(slave_dev))
+ return 0;
+
netif_device_attach(slave_dev);
if (p->phy) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists