[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01c74680c4b3aa25d9b4375a9ab5e10046b7c71b.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:21:26 -0500
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
aik@...abs.ru, robh@...nel.org, joe@...ches.com,
elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net, david@...son.dropbear.id.au,
mpe@...erman.id.au, hch@...radead.org, linuxram@...ibm.com,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@...ba.org,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Virtio uses DMA API for all devices
On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 22:08 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Please go through these patches and review whether this approach broadly
> > > > makes sense. I will appreciate suggestions, inputs, comments regarding
> > > > the patches or the approach in general. Thank you.
> > >
> > > Jason did some work on profiling this. Unfortunately he reports
> > > about 4% extra overhead from this switch on x86 with no vIOMMU.
> >
> > The test is rather simple, just run pktgen (pktgen_sample01_simple.sh) in
> > guest and measure PPS on tap on host.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> Could you supply host configuration involved please?
I wonder how much of that could be caused by Spectre mitigations
blowing up indirect function calls...
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists