[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180804201209.GA26701@embeddedor.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 15:12:09 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: emu10k1: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c
index 26f6eda..9f2b609 100644
--- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c
+++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_playback_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START:
snd_emu10k1_playback_invalidate_cache(emu, 1, epcm->extra); /* do we need this? */
snd_emu10k1_playback_invalidate_cache(emu, 0, epcm->voices[0]);
- /* follow thru */
+ /* fall through */
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE:
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_RESUME:
if (cmd == SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE)
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_efx_playback_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
}
snd_emu10k1_playback_invalidate_cache(emu, 1, epcm->extra);
- /* follow thru */
+ /* fall through */
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE:
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_RESUME:
snd_emu10k1_playback_prepare_voice(emu, epcm->extra, 1, 1, NULL);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists