[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180804075349.2314ae81@bbrezillon>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 07:53:49 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@...hiba.co.jp>
Cc: miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, dwmw2@...radead.org,
computersforpeace@...il.com, marek.vasut@...il.com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op()
On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 14:26:18 +0900
KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@...hiba.co.jp> wrote:
> This patch is a patch to support TOSHIBA MEMORY CORPORATION BENAND
> memory devices. This use vendor specific command
> (TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS) to know the exact bitflips. However, I
^ exact number of bitflips
> could not test this patch because I do not have a platform that
> supports chip-> exec_op. Therefore, I post this patch as RFC.
^ chip->exec_op()
How about adding ->exec_op() support to the controller driver you're
testing with?
> As soon as I get a platform that supports chip-> exec_op, I would like
> to test and re-post.
All the explanation about why this is an RFC should be placed after the
'---' separator so that it does not appear when we apply the patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@...hiba.co.jp>
With the commit message adjusted as suggested above,
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> index 8aec3fa..3f4683b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> @@ -23,14 +23,65 @@
> /* Recommended to rewrite for BENAND */
> #define TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED BIT(3)
>
> +/* ECC Status Read Command for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ 0x7A
> +
> +/* ECC Status Mask for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK 0x0F
> +
> +/* Uncorrectable Error for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORR 0x0F
> +
> +static int toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
> + u8 *buf)
> +{
> + u8 *ecc_status = buf;
> +
> + if (chip->exec_op) {
> + const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr =
> + nand_get_sdr_timings(&chip->data_interface);
> + struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
> + NAND_OP_CMD(TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ,
> + PSEC_TO_NSEC(sdr->tADL_min)),
> + NAND_OP_8BIT_DATA_IN(chip->ecc.steps, ecc_status, 0),
> + };
> + struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
> +
> + return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
> + }
> +
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> static int toshiba_nand_benand_eccstatus(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> int ret;
> unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> - u8 status;
> + u8 status, ecc_status[8];
>
> /* Check Status */
> + ret = toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(chip, ecc_status);
> + if (!ret) {
> + unsigned int i, bitflips = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
> + bitflips = ecc_status[i] & TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK;
> + if (bitflips == TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORR) {
> + mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> + } else {
> + mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += bitflips;
> + max_bitflips = max(max_bitflips, bitflips);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return max_bitflips;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Fallback to regular status check if
> + * toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op() failed.
> + */
> ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists