[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180804001840.18105-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 08:18:40 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
David1.Zhou@....com, airlied@...ux.ie
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpu: drm: radeon: r100: Replace mdelay() with msleep() and usleep_range() in r100_asic_reset()
r100_asic_reset() is never called in atomic context.
It calls mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary.
mdelay() can be replaced with msleep() and usleep_range().
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
index 7d39ed63e5be..09c418113d9a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
@@ -2576,17 +2576,17 @@ int r100_asic_reset(struct radeon_device *rdev, bool hard)
S_0000F0_SOFT_RESET_PP(1) |
S_0000F0_SOFT_RESET_RB(1));
RREG32(R_0000F0_RBBM_SOFT_RESET);
- mdelay(500);
+ msleep(500);
WREG32(R_0000F0_RBBM_SOFT_RESET, 0);
- mdelay(1);
+ usleep_range(1000, 2000);
status = RREG32(R_000E40_RBBM_STATUS);
dev_info(rdev->dev, "(%s:%d) RBBM_STATUS=0x%08X\n", __func__, __LINE__, status);
/* reset CP */
WREG32(R_0000F0_RBBM_SOFT_RESET, S_0000F0_SOFT_RESET_CP(1));
RREG32(R_0000F0_RBBM_SOFT_RESET);
- mdelay(500);
+ msleep(500);
WREG32(R_0000F0_RBBM_SOFT_RESET, 0);
- mdelay(1);
+ usleep_range(1000, 2000);
status = RREG32(R_000E40_RBBM_STATUS);
dev_info(rdev->dev, "(%s:%d) RBBM_STATUS=0x%08X\n", __func__, __LINE__, status);
/* restore PCI & busmastering */
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists