[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180805005903.GA5509@embeddedor.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 19:59:03 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] s390/qeth: use true and false for boolean values
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
index 1833e75..7175086 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ static bool qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(struct qeth_card *card,
int rc = 0;
if (!card->ipato.enabled)
- return 0;
+ return false;
if (addr->type != QETH_IP_TYPE_NORMAL)
- return 0;
+ return false;
qeth_l3_convert_addr_to_bits((u8 *) &addr->u, addr_bits,
(addr->proto == QETH_PROT_IPV4)? 4:16);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists