linux-kernel - Re: [rt-patch 4/3] arm,KVM: Move phys_timer handling to hard irq context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1533444777.9157.10.camel@gmx.de>
Date:   Sun, 05 Aug 2018 06:52:57 +0200
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [rt-patch 4/3] arm,KVM: Move phys_timer handling to hard irq
 context

On Sat, 2018-08-04 at 14:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> Besides, there are more interesting fish in the arm64 sea than kvm.
> 
> virgin 4.16.18-rt12-rt
> 
> [  537.236131] ITS queue timeout (65440 65504 4640)
> [  537.236150] ITS cmd its_build_inv_cmd failed

FWIW, I had thought that something 4.16..master had made that business
go entirely away, but it only became much more infrequent.  So much for
plan to slowly sneak up on whatever than was via ~bisect.