linux-kernel - [PATCH] RDS is not Radio Data System

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180805065920.GA8968@amd>
Date:   Sun, 5 Aug 2018 08:59:21 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     ka-cheong.poon@...cle.com, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Netdev list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] RDS is not Radio Data System

Hi!

Getting prompt "The RDS Protocol" (RDS) is not too helpful, and it is
easily confused with Radio Data System (which we may want to support
in kernel, too).

I wonder if option should be named NET_RDS, instead?

And this sounds like a good idea:

(Plus, we normally have "module will be called foobar" and if unsure
say X. What happened to those?)

diff --git a/net/rds/Kconfig b/net/rds/Kconfig
index 41f7556..2738f14 100644
--- a/net/rds/Kconfig
+++ b/net/rds/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 
 config RDS
-	tristate "The RDS Protocol"
+	tristate "The Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) Protocol"
 	depends on INET
 	---help---
 	  The RDS (Reliable Datagram Sockets) protocol provides reliable,



-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)