linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1] memory: tegra: Block DMA for clients HW on a faulty memory access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <89f0794e-affa-dba0-9684-582ce5570cad@kapsi.fi>
Date:   Sun, 5 Aug 2018 03:11:57 +0300
From:   Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] memory: tegra: Block DMA for clients HW on a
 faulty memory access

One potential issue is with host1x clients where userspace processes can 
submit jobs with invalid memory accesses (addresses not mapped to 
IOMMU). If when such a failure happens, we disable the DMA for the whole 
host1x client, unrelated userspace processes may see failures even 
though there is no problem with their jobs.

Mikko

On 08/04/2018 02:53 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 19:58:41 MSK Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Currently Memory Controller informs about erroneous memory accesses done
>> by memory clients and that's it. Let's make it to block whole HW unit
>> that corresponds to the misbehaving memory client in order to try to avoid
>> memory corruptions and to stop deliberate attempts of manipulation by a
>> misbehaving client.
> 
> Guys, any comments? That is a kinda useful feature, in worst case only some of
> memory could get corrupted instead of trashing the whole memory. In my
> experience with T20/30, the interrupt handling latency is low and blocking
> happens immediately after the first page fault.
> 
> 
>