[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180805103756.GA24849@amd>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 12:37:56 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>, arnd@...db.de,
gthelen@...gle.com, jgg@...lanox.com
Cc: santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDS is not Radio Data System
On Sun 2018-08-05 06:19:45, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (08/05/18 08:59), Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Getting prompt "The RDS Protocol" (RDS) is not too helpful, and it is
> > easily confused with Radio Data System (which we may want to support
> > in kernel, too).
> >
> > I wonder if option should be named NET_RDS, instead?
>
> RDS has been around for a while now (since 2.6). How will you
> rename proposal manage backward compatibility? Why can't you call
> your new option CONFIG_RADIO or similar instead?
>
> Are we going to rename NFS* to NET_NFS* because someone decided
> to reuse the NFS acronym?
Was it?
Because this was first time kernel asked that question... when I was
testing -next. Is this related?
commit 533d1daea8d8a389b37207ad7b50c4e750969231
IB: Revert "remove redundant INFINIBAND kconfig dependencies"
> > And this sounds like a good idea:
> > - tristate "The RDS Protocol"
> > + tristate "The Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) Protocol"
>
> surn that sounds fine.
Can you apply the patch, or do you want me to send it to davem?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists