linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: fsl-ifc: check result of SRAM initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180806092137.9287-2-kurt@linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon,  6 Aug 2018 11:21:36 +0200
From:   Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Jane Wan <Jane.Wan@...ia.com>,
        Jagdish Gediya <jagdish.gediya@....com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: fsl-ifc: check result of SRAM initialization

The SRAM initialization might fail. If that happens further NAND operations
won't be successful. Therefore, the chip init routine should fail if the SRAM
initialization didn't work.

Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c
index 24f59d0066af..e4f5792dc589 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static const struct nand_controller_ops fsl_ifc_controller_ops = {
 	.attach_chip = fsl_ifc_attach_chip,
 };
 
-static void fsl_ifc_sram_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
+static int fsl_ifc_sram_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
 {
 	struct fsl_ifc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
 	struct fsl_ifc_runtime __iomem *ifc_runtime = ctrl->rregs;
@@ -805,12 +805,16 @@ static void fsl_ifc_sram_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
 	wait_event_timeout(ctrl->nand_wait, ctrl->nand_stat,
 			   msecs_to_jiffies(IFC_TIMEOUT_MSECS));
 
-	if (ctrl->nand_stat != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC)
+	if (ctrl->nand_stat != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC) {
 		pr_err("fsl-ifc: Failed to Initialise SRAM\n");
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+	}
 
 	/* Restore CSOR and CSOR_ext */
 	ifc_out32(csor, &ifc_global->csor_cs[cs].csor);
 	ifc_out32(csor_ext, &ifc_global->csor_cs[cs].csor_ext);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int fsl_ifc_chip_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
@@ -914,8 +918,13 @@ static int fsl_ifc_chip_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
 		chip->ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
 	}
 
-	if (ctrl->version >= FSL_IFC_VERSION_1_1_0)
-		fsl_ifc_sram_init(priv);
+	if (ctrl->version >= FSL_IFC_VERSION_1_1_0) {
+		int ret;
+
+		ret = fsl_ifc_sram_init(priv);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * As IFC version 2.0.0 has 16KB of internal SRAM as compared to older
-- 
2.11.0